Baskerville Reports

The Official Papers Into The Matter Known As “The Hound of The Baskervilles” by Kieron Freeburn is a great addition for those who like to delve further into the Baskerville case. Written as a case file it includes reports by the Metropolitan police, the Coroner (on Sir Charles and the convict Selden), the Devon County Constabulary, and much more.

The most delightful part to me was the content of the reports. Having been a law enforcement officer for 12 years I can say that they are written authentically in the style of most police officers. The report s present not only the facts but the comments that officers tend to make that make the prosecution cringe and ask “why did they say that in an official document?” I guess things haven’t changed much!

The reports also display exactly the prejudices I would expect from one jurisdiction being infringed on by another. All in all, this book was a delightful read. I recommend it highly to those interested in the official response to the case that Holmes might not have handled as well as we thought.

Posted in Doyle, Holmes, Watson | Leave a comment

Sherlockian Reference

“Eliminate the Impossible” by Alistair Duncan falls in the category of Sherlockian reference work. It is an excellent first reference work for those who have recently discovered the “Great Detective” and are about to test the waters of becoming a true “Sherlockian”.  Mr. Duncan provides the reader with a synopsis of each of the original Doyle stories (the “Canon”) and provides an insight into some of the commonly deduced anomalies within each.

I believe it’s fair to say that Mr. Duncan is a devotee of Dakin and agrees with most of Dakin’s take on things such as the chronology of the Holmes cases. However, he is also well versed in the works of other Sherlockian’s (or Holmesian’s) such as Baring-Gould, Bunson and Blakeney and is willing to vary his own conclusions from that of Dankin as evidence is presented.

Mr. Duncan also presents a review of the major actors who have played Holmes. He does an admirable job critiquing such players as Rathbone, Brett, Wontner and Richardson. I especially found myself agreeing with his take on Frewer! This book was written before the latest addition to the movie Holmses with Downey; I’m really curious how Mr. Duncan would rate the latest actor to play Sherlock?

All in all, a good, easy read well worth adding to your beginning Holmes reference library.

Close to Holmes” by Alistair Duncan is an adjunct to his earlier work “Eliminate the Impossible” which is an excellent reference into the Holmes Canon. Close to Holmes takes the reader through the streets of both Holmes’ and Doyle’s London. So it’s best to take out your London map and follow along. Where was 221 Baker Street? How about the Northumberland Hotel where Henry Baskerville stayed? Or maybe you’re curious about all those railroad stations that Holmes and Watson were using to run off on their adventure? Mr. Duncan not only helps the search for these Sherlockian locations, he gives insight into the area and the era.Filled with an educated assessment of where the real locations are, Mr. Duncan also provides a vast array of photographic material. He shows the locations as they were and for the armchair traveler, how they appear today. Mr. Duncan takes the reader on a tour that is second only to being there.
Mr. Duncan does not limit himself to the areas close to Baker Street but also takes the reader to Norwood where a number of Holmes Stories occur (most notably The Sign of Four). If you have read Mr. Duncan’s “Eliminate the Impossible” you will also enjoy this volume. Well worth the read. It is obvious that Mr. Duncan knows not only Holmes but Doyle and London.
“The Norwood Author”

Mr. Duncan does an exceptional job of presenting Dr. Doyle in his day to day endeavors as a member of the local cricket club (for whom he did very well) as well as the Upper Norwood Literary and Scientific Society. Mr. Duncan also discusses Doyle’s other activities such as his writing for the magazine the Idler and just why did Doyle kill off Holmes in a way that he could return.

Mr. Duncan makes this volume one that deals with gaining an understanding of the man Doyle himself. It would indeed be interesting to have such an in depth biography of the man in his other locals. As in his last work Mr. Duncan provides numerous pictures of the area where Doyle lived and worked. This is indeed a work well researched.

by Alistair Duncan is an extensive, in depth look at the life of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle during the years 1891 to 1894 when he was a resident of South Norwood. Holmes fans are familiar with Doyle’s use of the local in his stories. This is the third volume from the pen of Mr. Duncan on the subject of Holmes and Dr. Doyle.

Posted in Holmes, Watson | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Watson’s Afghan Adventure

This is a story, set mostly in Afghanistan, during the Second Afghan War. On an evening Dr John Watson returns to 221B Baker St to find that in his absence his former orderly, Murray has visited and left a package. Watson agrees to tell Holmes the story behind the items in the box.Watson tells what brought him to his plan to become an Army Surgeon, his education, his meeting with new friends and an early flirtation before going off to Afghanistan.

Watson explains to Holmes his experiences in battle with his new regiment, his search for a treasure and his final battle at Maiwand. Holmes is let in on the experiences that bring Watson to London and his new life assisting the great detective.

Posted in Afghanistan, Holmes, Uncategorized, Watson | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Weapons of Maiwand

There has always appeared to be a lot of disagreement on exactly what was the “service revolver” that Watson carried in his many adventures. Doyle never really says and every movie has a different one, everything from an R.I.C. to a colt Single Action Army. For this book I have ventured that Watson, being a practical fellow and having grown up with firearms, is equipped with a Webley-Pryse six shot revolver in .476 calibre. Why? Well, the Pryse was patented in 1876 and by 1878 was becoming popular with army officers. It’s one big advantage was the fact that all 6 chambers could be loaded with safety and it had a self-extracting cartridge system. At the time, most 6 shot revolvers had to be carried with only 5 rounds loaded since the firing pin sat on the primer of a cartridge in a loaded chamber. This direct contact meant that there was a possibility of unintended discharge if the hammer was struck say by dropping the gun. The Pryse had a rebounding hammer which meant that when the hammer was at rest it did not make contact with the primer cartridge, thereby giving the user one more round before reloading. The self extraction system meant all the used cartridges were remover from the chamber on breaking the pistol open and new rounds could be reloaded quickly. Other pistols had to have the expended cartridges removed one at a time. Not a good thing when the enemy is pouring over the barricades!

The British Soldiers of the Infantry used the Martini- Henry Rifle. A breech loading, lever action, single shot rifle that fired a .577/450 bottleneck cartridge. It was extremely accurate to 400 yards and had a rapid rate of fire of 20 rounds a minute even though it was a single shot weapon. It was considered quite an improvement from the Snider conversions to the old muzzleloading Enfields that the Indian troops carried. It was always thought a good idea to keep the Indian soldiers one step behind in technology for two reasons: it was a place to send obsolete equipment and should there be another mutiny the Indian army would be outgunned.

Webley-Pryse

 The 66th Foot was armed with the Martini-Henry rifle, the native infantry had the  Snider rifles and the cavalry had the Snider carbine. 

Snider with open breech

The Snider was an Enfield1853 rifled musket that had been converted to breech-loading and could fire 10 to 15 .557-caliber rounds per minute out to an effective range of 400 yards.

The Afghan infantry  were armed with a vast assortment of weapons depending if they were regular units of the Khan or local tribesmen.

1853 Enfield Rifled Musket

The regular infantry had either imported or locally fabricated copies of the 1853 Enfield muzzle-loading rifles that fired two to three shots per minute. Some had locally made Snider rifles, but with quality problems the effective range was reduced to about 300 yards. The tribesmen were armed with an assortment of flintlock muskets with a 50- to 80-yard  effective range and a rate of fire of one shot in two minutes. 

Jezail

There was also the locally fabricated, flintlock smoothboe musket, The Jezail. The weapon that Dr Watson had long attributed to causing his wounds. But had it?

3in Rifled Armstrong

 The Afghan army had better artillery than the British and more of it! particularly its six very effective breech-loading, 3-inch rifled Armstrong guns. They could fire five rounds per minute. The Afghan artillery also had 23 other smoothbore weapons of varying sizes. Some sources say the number of Afghan cannon was as high as 32. The Afghan artillery’s effectiveness significantly influenced the battle, constantly pushing forward to the line of British infantry.

RML 9-pounder With Gunners

The British artillery had six 9-pounder muzzle-loading rifled guns manned by well trained cannoneers of E-B Royal Horse Artillery under Major Blackwood (who would die with the last stand of the 66th Foot). In addition there were six smoothbore pieces—four 6-pounder field guns and two 12-pounder howitzers manned by men of the 66th Foot and supervised by a dozen gunners of the RHA. It would be the combination of these two batteries under Captain Slade that would keep the retreat from becoming a complete rout (and perhaps save Watson?). The horse artillery’s 9-pounder field guns could fire shrapnel, case shot and high explosive out to 3,500 yards. Artillery played a major role in the battle.

Posted in Afghanistan, Watson | 9 Comments

How I Found Dr Watson

Sturt & Watson in the Valley

I’ve been asked where my fascination with Dr. Watson has come from. To tell the truth I can’t remember when I wasn’t interested in the man. As a small child my father (who taught English and Russian Literature at a university in NY) got me hooked on the Sherlock Holmes stories. Just his way to get me to learn to read I guess. But in reading Holmes, both the canon and the hundreds of pastiches, there was always the unknown quantity – Watson. He was intelligent, athletic, a fine shot, a good horseman and an Army veteran. But so much was unknown; How had he been at the Battle of Maiwand when his regiment was hundreds of miles away. What happened to his family? What had been his education, and on and on. As a career Army officer and Desert Storm veteran, wanting to know about Watson led me to wanting to know about the Second Afghan War and the disaster at Maiwand. Enormous lessons to be learned there. As a horse owner and raiser I wanted to know how Watson became a horseman. As a competitive shooter I wanted to know where he learned to handle a pistol, doubtful it would be in the streets of London. Why did he choose medicine over a more active occupation? And after 12 years of law enforcement I empathised with the often flexible outlook he took on the literal aspects of the law.

In looking at how Watson became who he was I looked first to things I knew about him. He enjoyed the army and missed it his whole civilian life. Why else the constant references to it? He was not a church going man but had an abiding faith. He had an inquisitive mind that was open to new ideas but had the nagging feeling of change not always being good. And even though he was an author, he was a man of few words when it came to the part he played.

In “Watson’s Afghan Adventure” I have tried to answer many of the above questions and contradictions found in Watson. Hopefully his inquisitive mind, his adventuresome nature and his loyalty stand out in this tale.

Posted in Afghanistan, Holmes, Watson | Tagged , , | 3 Comments